↓ Skip to Main Content
SEC ACTIONS
  • Home
  • Articles
  • Archives
  • Media
  • Related Links
  • About
  • Subscribe to our Mailinglist
Home › SECActions ›

When an Offering Fraud Becomes Bankruptcy Fraud

When an Offering Fraud Becomes Bankruptcy Fraud

T. GormanPosted on September 26, 2023 Posted in SECActions

As the count down to the end of the government fiscal year nears an end, the Commission continues its race to file as many new enforcement cases as possible. Of course, in the immediate future piling up statistics may not be as big an accomplishment as in other years – a default looms on Saturday if a budget deal is not made. At the same time, of course, even if there is a default at some point Congress will again fund the Government and things will go on. At that point the question of how many cases were filed in the last fiscal year will be important as the new budget hearings begin.

While a large variety of cases are being filed as the deadline draws near, there appears to be a significant variety of actions being initiated. Some, of course, are in the typical categories that tend to dominate the statistics. For example, yesterday the agency brought another Ponzi scheme case crafted by a seemingly well-educated man residing in the suburbs of Cleveland, Ohio – SEC v. Motil, Civil Action No. 23-cv-1853 (N.D. Ohio. Filed September 25, 2023).

Named as defendants are Mathew Motil and three of his entities — North Shore Equity Sales, LLC, The Marie Paul Company and North Shore Equity Management, LLC. Defendant Matthew Motil is a principal of NS Sales and NS Management. He is also an Ohio-licensed engineer and claimed to be a real estate expert. In addition, he supposedly holds MBA, Ph.D and JD degrees.

Defendant Motile is alleged to have created a lucrative real estate investment scheme. He solicited investors by promising them short-term, low-risk and high-return promissory notes collateralized by residential real estate located throughout Ohio. A good example of how the plan worked involved the issuance of at least 20 investor promissory notes to cover over $1.3 million of investor capital. The notes were collateralized by a home acquired by Defendant Motil or one of his entities. The home had a value of $130,000. Ultimately Defendant Motile used investor funds to make over $3.7 million in Ponzi payments, spend over $1.6 million on personal expenses and divert millions of dollars in other investor funds to selected projects and his wife.

Over a period of about 4 years, beginning in October 2017, Defendant Motile used a number of his controlled entities, such as North Shore Equity Management, to raise over $11 million from 60 investors across the U.S. The scheme then collapsed, In March 2022 Mr. Motile filed for bankruptcy, listing the investors as creditors. The complaint alleges violations of Securities Act Sections 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) and Exchange Act Section 10(b). The case is in litigation.

Print 🖨 PDF 📄
‹

This Week In Securities Litigation (Week of September 25, 2023)

Family Insider Trading

›
Tagged with: offering fraud, Ponzi scheme, SEC

Search SEC Actions

Prepared:

Thomas O. Gorman

DC Attorney specializing in securities
and other agency litigation

Former SEC Senior Counsel, Enforcement
and Special Trial Counsel, GC Office
    © 2025 SEC ACTIONS
    • Subscribe to our Mailinglist
    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}