Digital Currencies and Federal Regulators

Digital assets are potentially within the sphere of a number of federal law enforcement agencies. Those include the SEC, CFTC, DOJ, FinCEN and others. Stated differently, using bitcoin or another digital currency does not authorize ignoring federal regulators: If there is a security the SEC becomes involved; a commodity, such as a coin, the CFTC; fraud, the DOJ; and of course if there is money, FinCEN. Consider, for example, the case of a digital currency exchange born overseas and operated by a foreign national. The firm had no interaction with any of the alphabet soup of federal agencies that might have an interest. There-in was the problem however – acting as a money changer turns the firm into a financial institution requiring registration with FinCEN. U.S. v. BT-e, Civil Action No. 4:19-cv-04281 (N.D. Cal. Filed July 25, 2019).

Alexander Vinnik, and BT-e, the firm were he worked as an executive, were named as defendants in the forfeiture action. BT-e is a digital currency exchange organized as a corporation under the laws of Cyprus and the Seychelles Islands. The firm operates in Bulgaria, the Seychells and other jurisdictions that include the Northern District of California. Mr. Vinnick, a Russian national, had several accounts at the firm. Some were tied to thefts from other virtual currency exchanges such as Mt. Gox. He is currently being held in a Greek prison.

DOJ brought criminal charges against the firm and its executive. In May 2016 a two-count indictment charging BTC-e and Mr. Vinnik with operating an unlicensed Money Services Business. A superseding 21 count indictment centered on the same charges was returned early the next year. An extradition request for Mr. Vinnik has been initiated.

FinCEN assessed monetary penalties against BTC-e and its executive for violations of the Bank Secrecy Act or BSA. Those include $12 million in penalties against Mr. Vannick and $88,586,314 against BTC-e for violations of the BSA. The penalties are predicated on the following:

Registration violations: The exchange, considered a financial institution under the BSA, did not register with FinCEN as a Money Services Business or MSB within 180 days of starting operations;

AML violations: The Bank Secrecy Act and the Money Services Business requirements require that the firm develop and implement an effective AML program; and

File SARs: Under the BSA an MSB the exchange must file a SAR if it becomes aware of or suspects a suspicious transaction or transactions that aggregate to at least $2,000 in value.

The civil forfeiture suit has been brought to collect the penalties imposed by FinCEN. That action is pending. The 21 count superseding indictment is pending.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email
Tagged with: , , , ,