Through the holidays the filing of new enforcement actions slowed. Similarly, the filing of new rule making projects slowed. With the end of that period look for increased enforcement activities and a flurry of rule making activity on existing and new projects.

Be careful, be safe this week – all the best in the new year.

SEC Enforcement – Filed and Settled Actions

Statistics: This week the Commission filed 2 new civil injunctive actions and no new administrative proceedings, excluding tag-along actions and those that present a conflict for the author.

Offering fraud: SEC v. Carmovale, Civil Action No. 1:21-cvf-11938 (D.Mass.) is a previously filed action which named as defendants Armar Bahadoorsingh and Vincenzo Carnovale. Defendants were alleged to have fraudulently used a number of microcap issuer to defraud unsuspecting investors. Defendants were alleged to have misled brokers and others into believing shares of a number of microcap firms could be traded when in fact they could not. On March 31, 2023, the District Court in Boston, Massachusetts entered a final judgment against defendant Bahadoorsingh by default. The judgment precludes future violations of Securities Act Sections 5 and 17(a) and Exchange Act ection 10(b). Defendant was also ordered to pay disgorgement of $231,020, prejudgment interest of $28,416 and a penalty of $207,183. See Lit. Rel. No. 25685 (March 31, 2023).

Insider trading: SEC v. Giguiere, Civil Action No. 1:21-cv-05923 (S.D.N.Y. ) is an action which named as defendant Gannon Giguiere. He was charged with insider trading in advance of an announcement by Long Blockchain Company, that it was going to move from its existing beverage business to blockchain technology. Defendant Giguiere is allaged to have traded in the shares shortly after being tipped by a close friend who furnished the information about the deal based on a tip from an insider who furnished it to him in violation of a confidentially agreement. The announcement of this information caused the stock price to spike up dramatically. The complaint alleges that within hours of the deal announcement he sold his shares for a profit of over $160,000. To resolve the matter, Defendant Giruiere consented to the entry of a permanent injunction prohibiting future violations of Exchange Act Section 10(b) and agreed to pay a penalty of $325,000. See Lit. Rel. No. 25920 (January 3, 2024).

Offering fraud: SEC v. Kapoor, Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-24903 (S.D. Fla. Filed December 27, 2023) is an action which names defendants: Rishi Kapoor, the CEO of Location Ventures until he was removed from that position in August 2023 and as the manager of URBIN; Location Ventures, LLC; URBIN, LLC and other affiliates. Location Ventures purportedly invested in real estate; URBIN claimed to invest in certain specialized real estate projects. Investors were told that Mr. Kapoor and his partners made a $13 million investment in the ventures. He used a plethora of entities to conceal the claimed investment. Potential investors were given budgets for various entities that were false. He also told investors that their money was segregated and not comingled. Both claims were false. As investor fund were shuffled among a long list of entities, the funds were comingled and Mr. Kapoor misappropriated part of the money. Eventually, the Location Ventures and URBIN projects stalled from a lack of funds. About $93 million had been raised from approximately 50 investors over a five-year period beginning in January 2018. The complaint alleges violations of Securities Act Section 17(a) and Exchange Act Sections 10(b) and 20(a). The case is in litigation. See Lit. Rel. No. 25921 (January 3, 2024).

FinCEN

Registration: The Financial Crimes Network or FinCEN announced in January 1, 2024 that existing firms must register with the agency within one year and newly formed firms within 90. The reports need only be amended update or correct information in the future (here).

3

Introduction

This is the first installment of a four part series analyzing the trends in SEC enforcement during the third calendar quarter of 2023. The series will focus on the number of cases brought during the period and the types of actions filed.

When the data from this third quarter of the year is compared to that from other quarters and periods it can help assess the overall direction of SEC enforcement. Considering the direction of SEC enforcement can aid those involved with regulated entities, such as brokers and investment advisers, as well as others who deal with the Commission periodically.

The series has four segments: 1) Basic statistics; 2) examples of cases in each of the leading areas; 3) examples of significant cases not in the leading categories; and 4) the conclusion.

The Statistics

The number of new cases filed during each period, and the areas in which they are brought, are always key statistics. While the numbers are not determinative in and of themselves, when considered in context they can reveal matters such as focus, areas of concentration and other significant information. When placed in the large context of other time periods even more information about the enforcement program can be garnered.

During the third quarter of 2023 SEC enforcement filed 144 new enforcement actions. Well over half of the cases filed during the period were civil injunctive actions – 81 – while the balance –63 – were administrative proceedings.

By any measure, the number of new cases filed during the third quarter of the year is impressive, particularly when compared to other periods. For example, when the number cases filed during 3Q23 is compared to that for the first quarter of each of the last three years, the number dwarfs that from other periods: In 1Q23 80 new cases were filed while in 1Q 22 only 48 new while the same number as filed in 1Q21.

Only when the number of new cases filed in 3Q23 is compared to that from earlier years in the third quarter of the year are the numbers comparable. In 3Q22 a total of 129 new cases were filed. In 3Q 21, however, a total number was 144. The numbers are comparable because traditionally the agency focuses on filing large numbers of cases in the third quarter of the year which is the end of the government fiscal year when performance statistics are finalized and complied for Congressional hears and other, similar purposes.

The largest groups of cases brought in the third quarter were as follows:

Offering frauds    25%

Insider trading    9%

Crypto assets     5.5%

Manipulation     4.8%

Misrepresentation   4.8%

These statistics demonstrate that over 34% of the cases filed during 3Q23 were either offering frauds or involved insider trading. Thus, despite the large number of cases initiated during the period the percentages reflect the fact that that the cases were concentrated in two typical areas in which actions are brought. Perhaps more importantly, the concentration into the offering fraud and insider trading areas in 3Q23 essentially mirrors that of the prior quarter when the top two categories were also offering frauds at, but at 29%, and insider trading at 9% for a total of over 36% of cases filed during the period. This at least suggests that that the focus of enforcement may be narrowing compared to earlier periods, a question that will be revisited at the conclusion of the series.

Next: Part II (Tuesday Jan. 6, 2024) – Examples of cases filed in each of the largest five categories for 3Q23.

Tagged with: , , ,