by T. GormanPosted on Posted in SECActions

The SEC filed another settled FCPA action. The proceeding named two individuals as Respondents. It centers on using expensive gifts and travel as bribes. In the Matter of Stephen Timms, Adm. Proc. File No. 3-16281 (November 17, 2014).

Respondents Stephen Timms and Yasser Ramahi, both U.S. citizens who reside abroad, were employed by FLIR Systems, Inc. The firm, founded in 1978, makes thermal imaging and other sensing products and systems, night vision and infrared camera systems. Mr. Timms was, at the time of the events at issue here, the head of FLIR’s Middle East office in Dubai. Mr. Ramahi worked in business development in the same office. He was one of the executives responsible for obtaining business in the firm’s Government Systems division for the Arabia Ministry of Interior.

In November 2008 FLIR entered into a contract with the Arabia Ministry to sell thermal binoculars. The agreement was worth about $12.9 million. The factory acceptance test was a key condition to the fulfillment of the contract. The firm expected that a successful contract would lead to others.

In May 2009 FLIR signed another agreement. This contract called for the integration of its cameras into the product of another firm, again for the Arabia Ministry. The contract was valued at $17.4 million. Messrs. Ramahi and Timmins were involved with the negotiations for both contracts.

In February 2009 Messrs. Ramahi and Timms began preparing for the factory acceptance test, scheduled for July 2009 in Billerica, Massachusetts. The next month Mr. Timms, in the presence of Mr. Ramahi, provided five Ministry officials with watches as gifts. Each watch cost about $1,424, according Mr. Timms. The invoices were submitted to the company for payment.

Subsequently, arrangements were made for the Ministry officials to go on what Mr. Timms later called a “world tour” in connection with the test. The tour began with travel from Rihadh to Casablanca, moved to Paris and then Boston. At each location the group stayed in luxury hotels for several days. While in Boston the group took a side trip to New York City. On the way back one official traveled to Beirut before returning to Riyadh. The travel extended over twenty nights. The factory tour took place in Boston in one afternoon. The company paid all expenses.

In July 2009 FLIR’s finance department flagged the reimbursement request for the watches. Mr. Timms claimed he had made a mistake, falsely stating that the total cost should have been $1,900 rather than the total submitted. Mr. Ramahi then secured a fabricated invoice which Mr. Timms submitted to the finance department. He also told the finance department that each watch cost about $377. Mr. Timms subsequently arranged for a firm agent to cover-up the true costs when questioned by the finance department.

Messrs. Ramahi and Timms also claimed that cost for the “world tour” was a mistake. The finance department was told that the Ministry had used the firm travel agent to book their own travel which was mistakenly billed to FLIR. Mr. Timms submitted a false invoice to the finance department.

Following the inspection, the Ministry told FLIR to ship the thermal binoculars. Later the Ministry ordered additional binoculars.

Throughout this process, FLIR had a code of conduct which prohibited firm employees from violating the FCPA. The policy required that all information be accurately recorded. Messrs. Ramahi and Timms had received FCPA training prior to the events involved here.

The Order alleges violations of Exchange Act Sections 30A, 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(5). Each Respondent consented to the entry of a cease and desist order based on the Sections cited in the Order. Mr. Timms agreed to pay a civil money penalty of $50,000. Mr. Ramahi will pay a penalty of $20,000.

Tagged with: ,

by T. GormanPosted on Posted in SECActions

Roderick Hills, who passed away at the end of last month, served as Chairman of the SEC through one if its most turbulent periods – the birth of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. When Mr. Hills became Chairman in 1975 the SEC had already initiated the first of what would become a series of illicit payment cases, having settled with American Ship Building and its then CEO.

In his first year of service, and throughout his term, the agency resolved a series of foreign payments cases with some of the largest corporations in the U.S. and their senior executives. Those settlements included Phillips Petroleum (1975), Northrop (1975), Gulf Oil (1975), Lockheed Aircraft (1976) and General Tire (1976). Each of the settlements reflected the fundamental values of the securities laws – accountability to the shareholders whose money was being used to make the illicit payments. Thus each settlement focused on improving corporate governance, accountability and transparency.

While the Commission’s foreign payments actions were successful many were highly critical of the investigations and cases. Some thought the cases should not have been brought. Others claimed that the sums involved were not material. Still others argued that since many of the transactions took place in foreign countries the issue was one of local law in the particular country. Even within the government there was debate with the State Department expressing concern regarding the implications of corporate payments on foreign policy while the Department of Defense, which assisted manufactures selling weapons systems, was actually involved in some of the conduct. Chairman Hills recounted some of the criticisms faced by the SEC in a speech delivered at Yale Law School in 1976:

· One commentator stated that the questionable payments cases were just another experiment doomed to fail, comparing the cases to prohibition: “’America’s unlamented noble experiment with prohibition in the 1920’s made more sense than this new crackdown. Back then, the do-good arguments for banning booze worked out as a bonanza for crime, corruption, and conspiracy. Now the SEC’s new experiment in righteousness is about to backfire too. It will register more laughter abroad than sales. Washington’s cleanup code for corporations under pressure to pay off abroad is reducing America to a role of ‘a pitiful, helpless giant’ . . .’”

· Another comment from a distinguished Washington lawyer and former SEC staff member noted: “‘What function remains for the SEC here? I submit; none. The Commission is plainly out of its ballpark . . . ‘”

· A state court judge wrote: “‘I read your bureaucratic blurb in the Wall Street Journal today (about foreign payment cases). You are out of your mind. Stockholders don’t give a good damn.’”

During the on-going Congressional hearings a series of proposals were debated that could impact the future of the agency. Those included one to give the SEC criminal authority and others focused on adding criminal bribery provisions but not the books and records and internal control provisions favored by the SEC.

Throughout the pubic criticism and Congressional debates the SEC continued with its investigations. The culminated was the Volunteer Program during which 450 companies self-reported, conducted extensive internal investigations, disclosed wrongful conduct and settled actions with the Commission, agreeing to significant remedies. The program did not offer issuers or those involved immunity from prosecution, or even promise “cooperation credit.” It did not require the company to consult with the SEC staff. Rather, it was an effort to spur corporate self-governance since the illicit or questionable payment cases graphically illuminated serious corporate self-governance issues. As Chairman Hills stated:

“It is apparent that our system of corporate self-regulation policed by independent auditors, directors and counsel and ultimately enforced by the SEC has broken down. Hundreds of millions of dollars have been siphoned out of corporate cash flow and spent out of slush funds with the knowledge of some members of top corporate management but without the knowledge of the outside directors, outside auditors and stockholders. No matter that it is only a score or so out of thousands, some are among the biggest and the most audited corporations in the world. If they can do it, who can’t?’ ”

The Volunteer Program, as well as the other foreign payments cases brought by the agency during the period, was a step toward repairing and strengthening corporate self-governance under the supervision not of the government but of the board of directors and its independent directors and outside auditors and counsel. It was that focus which sparked the initial inquiries. It was that continued focus through the tenure of Chairman Hills that made the cases a success and ultimately helped craft the FCPA by the end of his term in 1977.

Tagged with: , ,