Bookmark us

About this blog.

Prepared by:

Thomas O. Gorman,
Dorsey and Whitney LLP
1801 K St. N.W.
Suite 750
Washington, D.C. 20006

Media Interviews

TV news appearances



Search for additional articles and cases on this site:

Articles on securities law topics

Aiding and Abetting

Audit Committee Guide


Central Bank Decision

Class and Derivative Suits

Cooperation Standards

Corruption Digest

Criminal Security Cases

Directors & Officers Liability


Financial statement fraud

Insider Trading

Internal Investigations

Market Crisis

Parallel Proceedings

Rule 10b-5-1 Plans

Sarbanes Oxley Act


SECActions Trend Analysis

SEC Enforcement

SEC Investigations

Secondary Liability

Stock Option Backdating

Tellabs Decision

Sign up for our mailing list

Get an e-mail notification every time we have some new content

You can subscribe here

Related links

  • Disclaimer:


    Ralph Lauren Settles FCPA Charges with DOJ and SEC

    Ralph Lauren Corporation settled FCPA charges with the first double non-prosecution agreement. The company resolved possible charges with the DOJ and the SEC under non-prosecution agreements. The Department of Justice frequently resolved anti-corruption actions on this basis. For the SEC, however, the settlement represents its first non-prosecution agreement under an initiative that stems from the historic reorganization of its Enforcement Division. Enforcement officials credited the cooperation of the company in the settlement process.

    The underlying case stems from actions taken by Ralph Lauren’s indirect, wholly-owned, subsidiary in Argentina. Over a five year period beginning in 2003the subsidiary retained a customs broker to assist with clearing its merchandise. During that period the General Manager of the subsidiary approved the payment of bribes to permit clearance of items without the necessary paper work, of prohibited goods and to avoid inspections.

    The bribes were paid by falsifying the books and records. Specifically, the customs agent submitted invoices to the General Manager, or those reporting to him, for approval. Those invoices also included payments for “Loading and Delivery” and “Stamp Tax/Label Tax” to disguise the bribes. Gifts ranging in value from $400 to $14,000 each were also furnished to officials beginning in 2005.

    The company leaned about the conduct in 2010 when implementing a new FCPA policy under the direction of the Ralph Lauren board of directors. After employees reviewed the new policy they informed company officials. The company the terminated its custom broker and took a series of steps which included: 1) amending its anticorruption policy; 2) enhancing due diligence procedures for third parties; 3) enhancing its commission policy; 4) amending its gift policy; 5) conducting in-person anticorruption training for certain employees; and 6) eventually terminating its retail operations in Argentina.

    Ralph Lauren also cooperated with enforcement officials. The company self-reported, produced all documents, voluntarily furnished translations of documents, made witnesses available for interview, and conducted a world- wide risk assessment.

    Under the terms of the DOJ non-prosecution agreement Ralph Lauren agreed to pay a penalty of $882,000. Under the terms of the SEC agreement the company agreed to pay disgorgement of $593,000 and prejudgment interest.

    Print Friendly