Bookmark us

About this blog

Prepared by:

Thomas O. Gorman,
Porter Wright
Washington, DC
202-778-3004

Former Senior Counsel, SEC
    Enforcement Div.
Co-chair, ABA White Collar
    Securities Section
Chair, Porter Wright Securities
    Litigation Group

tgorman@porterwright.com

Search for additional articles and cases on this site:

Articles on securities law topics

Aiding and Abetting

Audit Committee Guide

Causation

Cooperation Standards

Central Bank Decision

Class and Derivative Suits

Directors & Officers Liability

FCPA

Insider Trading

Internal Investigations

Market Crisis

Parallel Proceedings

Rule 10b-5-1 Plans

Sarbanes Oxley Act

Scienter

SECActions Trend Analysis

SEC Enforcement

SEC Investigations

Secondary Liability

Stock Option Backdating

Tellabs Decision
Videos of Mr. Gorman's
TV appearances:


Mr. Gorman's videos





Sign up for our mailing list

Get an e-mail notification every time we have some new content

You can subscribe here

Related links

  • Disclaimer:

    Privacy Policy
    Disclaimer


    SEC Enforcement Cases: Focus On Individuals, Declining Corporate Penalties

    NERA Economic Consulting has developed a proprietary database of post-SOX SEC enforcement statistics which provides interesting comparative data.

    First, the statistics demonstrate that most enforcement cases are brought against individuals. Since the passage of Sarbanes Oxley, the SEC has filed over 4,700 enforcement actions. About three times as many of those actions named individuals as defendants compared to corporations.

    By far, the largest category of cases involves microcap fraud, which includes boiler room operations, pump and dump schemes, fraudulent offerings and similar matters. The next largest category involves misstatements and omissions. That category includes option backdating. Insider trading is number five on the list (misappropriation of investor funds in ponzi schemes and misrepresentations to investors are, respectively three and four). While misstatements and omissions would appear to be a type of case which focuses on issuers, 700 individuals were charged in these cases while only 197 companies were named as defendants in the post-SOX time period.

    For 2008, NERA projects that the number of settled cases based on misstatements will increase. The report projects that there will be 157 settled cases in this category for 2008, up slightly from 151 in 2007. If the projection is correct, it will be the highest post-SOX number in this category. The dollar value of those settlements is projected to fall, however. The high was in 2006 at about $50 million, while for 2008 the value it projected to be only $12 million. The projected 2008 amount is less than half that of 2007, but exceeds the amounts for 2002 through 2005.

    The report also projects a record number of settlements for 2008. Following three years of decline (from 898 in 2003 to 663 in 2006), the report projects that the SEC should settle 739 cases in 2008. That increase however, is being driven by settlements with individuals, not issuers. The projection suggests that the SEC will have 568 settlements with individuals compared 171 with business organization. If that projection is correct, it would be the lowest number of company settlements since the passage of SOX.

    The potential decrease in company settlements also appears to be reflected in the amount of penalties being imposed on issuers in SEC enforcement actions. From 2002, when SOX was passed, through 2006, the mean amount of those penalties rose from $0.01 to $1.5 million. While the projected mean settlement for 2008 of $1 million exceeds the 2007 mean by about $0.3 million, it is the lowest since 2003. This may reflect the impact of the new procedure instituted by Chairman Cox for the consideration of corporate penalties, discussed here. This also seems to track the mean value of corporate SEC settlements, which peaked in 2003 and for 2008 is projected to decline to its lowest value since 2002. Similarly, the monetary component of corporate settlements with the SEC is predominately composed of penalties rather than disgorgement, while the opposite is true for individuals.

    Overall, while SEC enforcement actions seem to focus on individuals and the number of settled cases may be increasing overall in the post-SOX era, the percentage of those brought against issuers is declining, as is the dollar value of corporate settlement, which is, in large part, penalties rather than disgorgement.

    Print This Post Print This Post

    Email This Post Email This Post

    Comments are closed.