Bookmark us

About this blog

Prepared by:

Thomas O. Gorman,
Porter Wright
Washington, DC
202-778-3004

Former Senior Counsel, SEC
    Enforcement Div.
Co-chair, ABA White Collar
    Securities Section
Chair, Porter Wright Securities
    Litigation Group

tgorman@porterwright.com

Search for additional articles and cases on this site:

Articles on securities law topics

Aiding and Abetting

Audit Committee Guide

Causation

Cooperation Standards

Central Bank Decision

Class and Derivative Suits

Directors & Officers Liability

FCPA

Insider Trading

Internal Investigations

Market Crisis

Parallel Proceedings

Rule 10b-5-1 Plans

Sarbanes Oxley Act

Scienter

SECActions Trend Analysis

SEC Enforcement

SEC Investigations

Secondary Liability

Stock Option Backdating

Tellabs Decision
Videos of Mr. Gorman's
TV appearances:


Mr. Gorman's videos





Sign up for our mailing list

Get an e-mail notification every time we have some new content

You can subscribe here

Related links

  • Disclaimer:

    Privacy Policy
    Disclaimer


    The SEC Files Another Insider Trading Case Based On International Trading

    Trading in the U.S. markets through foreign accounts does not shield the trader from SEC scrutiny and potential liability. On Friday, the SEC reaffirmed this point, filing another insider trading case based on international trading. SEC v. One or More Unknown Purchasers of the Call Options for the Common Stock of DRS Technologies, Inc., Civil Action No. 08-cv-6609 (S.D.N.Y. Filed July 25, 2008). This case is based on trading in advance of the announcement of the merger talks between DRS Technologies, Inc. and Finmeccanica S.p.A., the same takeover transaction which is the predicate for an earlier insider trading case. SEC v. De Colli, Civil Action No. 08-civ-4520 (S.D.N.Y. May 15, 2008), discussed here.

    The emergency action filed Friday froze assets related to option trading in the shares of DRS Technologies. The complaint also alleges insider trading in options of American Power Conversion Corp, two years earlier. The trading was through an account at UBS AG.

    As to the DRS options, the complaint claims that an unknown purchaser acquired 1,820 out of the money and soon to expire call options for over $456,200. Immediately following a May 8th Wall Street Journal article reporting advanced merger negotiations between Finmeccanica and DRA, the unknown purchaser liquidated all of the options, making an illegal profit of about $1.6 million. Subsequently, on May 12, 2008, the merger of the two companies was announced. The allegations here are similar to those made in the De Colli case filed earlier this year.

    The complaint also alleges that the unknown purchaser traded on inside information when acquiring 2,830 American Power call options at a cost of about $343,000 in September and October 2006. On October 30, 2006 Schneider Electric SA announced the acquisition of American Power for $31 per share. The unknown purchaser subsequently liquidated the options at a profit of about $1.7 million.

    This case is another example of the SEC working closely with other regulators to quickly bring an insider trading case that involved international trading. In filing this action, the SEC worked with the Swiss Federal Banking Commission, the Department of Justice and the Chicago Board of Options Exchange.

    Print This Post Print This Post

    Email This Post Email This Post

    Comments are closed.